Social Media Use Among Plastic Surgeons in China: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Professional Benefits, Ethical Risks, and Platform-Specific Challenges.

Authors

Yang Hu, Chengwu Zhang, Yonggan Niu, Xianrui Wu, Xuan Zhou, Xiangyu Chen, Zenan Li, Can Liu, Jianda Zhou, Ping Li

Published in

Aesthetic plastic surgery. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of social media has significantly altered the landscape of patient communication, professional branding, and ethical practice in plastic surgery. In China, where the aesthetic medicine market is growing rapidly, surgeons increasingly rely on platforms such as Xiaohongshu and Douyin to engage with patients. However, the implications of this digital transformation for clinical practice remain insufficiently explored.
A national cross-sectional survey of 800 licensed plastic surgeons was conducted from December 2024 to March 2025. The questionnaire assessed platform usage, perceived benefits, patient interactions, and ethical concerns. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.
WeChat Video (62.75%) and Xiaohongshu (61.13%) were the most utilized platforms. A majority reported enhanced professional visibility (84.00%) and income growth (57.50%), though 52.87% attributed ≤ 10% of income to social media. Key challenges included unrealistic patient expectations (69.43%), negative feedback (62.18%), and exposure to misleading advertisements (76.68%). Platform-specific risks emerged: Douyin was associated with privacy breaches (p = 0.015) and patient dissatisfaction (p = 0.008), while Xiaohongshu correlated with patient acquisition (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneous patterns across experience levels and institution types, with private-sector surgeons with 6-10 years of experience reporting consistently favorable social media-related outcomes.
Social media was perceived as a useful adjunct for professional visibility, patient communication, and practice development among Chinese plastic surgeons. Its use was also associated with ethical and operational challenges, including unrealistic expectations, privacy concerns, misinformation, and patient dissatisfaction. These association-based findings support the need for platform-specific guidance, transparent risk disclosure, and stronger privacy safeguards in digital aesthetic practice.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

PMID:
42443421
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.