Predicting Neonatal Respiratory Outcomes Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review Through a Life Course Lens.

Authors

Janet Northcote, Sawyer Olson, Tamara G R Macieira, Leslie A Parker, Mei Liu, Lisiane Pruinelli

Published in

Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

Neonatal respiratory outcomes remain leading drivers of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospitalization, underscoring the need for accurate early risk prediction through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) approaches.
To conduct a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided systematic review synthesizing AI/ML models predicting neonatal respiratory outcomes through a Life Course Health Development (LCHD) lens, examining whether models incorporate developmental timing, cumulative processes, and contextual factors.
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from January 1, 2014, to July 18, 2025.
Included peer-reviewed studies developing or validating AI/ML prediction models for neonatal respiratory outcomes with performance metrics. Excluded non-ML regression, non-original research, and non-English studies. Of 4319 records initially identified, 1780 unique records were screened, 33 underwent full-text review (0.76%); 16 met selection criteria (0.37%).
Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics, inputs, algorithms, validation strategies, and performance metrics. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST + AI. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Studies addressed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (n = 8), respiratory distress syndrome (n = 4), apnea of prematurity (n = 3), and massive pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 1). Discrimination was strong in internal validation (several models with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.85). External validation was rare (2/16); calibration reporting was sparse. No studies predicted postdischarge respiratory outcomes or included comprehensive determinants of health.
Although ML models show promise for NICU risk stratification, responsible clinical adoption requires multisite external validation, routine calibration, and nursing-informed designs incorporating development context. See Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content.

PMID:
42441483
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.