Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparing machine learning methods predicting transcriptome from epigenome with applications to association studies.

Created on 14 Jul 2026

Authors

Fatemeh Behjati Ardakani, Shamim Ashrafiyan, Laura Rumpf, Dennis Hecker, Marcel H Schulz

Published in

Genome biology. Volume 27. Issue 1. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

Understanding how epigenome variation contributes to gene expression in disease and development is a fundamental challenge. Regulatory regions show cell type-specific epigenome activity and differ in their location, size, and distance to their target genes, complicating discovery and analysis. Recent machine learning models have been proposed to address these problems by learning functions for the prediction of gene expression from epigenomic data.
Here, we use the large IHEC EpiATLAS dataset to benchmark state-of-the-art linear and nonlinear approaches. We optimize each approach for over 28,000 human genes, providing an inferred regulatory catalog of gene models. In-depth comparison reveals that gene characteristics and the epigenomic complexity of the locus influence the difficulty of predicting the epigenome-to-transcriptome association. The model performance is further evaluated using CRISPRi and eQTL validation data. Based on these models, we conduct histone-acetylation association studies in a systematic way to investigate how epigenetic variation impacts gene expression. The model-based analysis revealed genes and regulatory regions linked to B-cell leukemia in patient data with known disease-related functions.
Our work provides a foundation for applications that link epigenome variation to gene expression in human cells, by benchmarking methods on a per-gene basis, illustrating their use in a disease context and making trained models available to the community.

PMID:
42444001
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement