Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Successful transcranial motor evoked potentials monitoring under remimazolam-based anaesthesia: Case reports of two patients.

Created on 14 Jul 2026

Authors

Jan Hudec, Tereza Prokopova, Michal Galko, Roman Gal

Published in

Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. Jul 07, 2026. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is a standard in surgeries with an increased risk of iatrogenic neurological injury development. The gold standard for this monitoring modality is propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). Although there seems to be no clinically significant complication for propofol administration in patients with soy, egg, or peanut allergies, a whole range of recommendations still prohibit propofol administration in patients with these allergies. Remimazolam is a new, ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that can potentially be an alternative in cases of propofol contraindications in need of TIVA.
We report two cases of a 19-year-old girl and a 17-year-old boy undergoing scoliosis surgery with transcranial motor evoked potentials monitoring (TcMEP). We chose remimazolam-based total intravenous anaesthesia due to the severe peanut and soy allergy, respectively. Total intravenous anaesthesia was maintained with remimazolam at a dose of 1.5-2 mg/kg/h and remifentanil at a dose of 0.5-0.8 µg/kg/min. Depth of anaesthesia was controlled using frontal EEG monitoring. TcMEP remained stable and showed no significant alterations throughout the surgeries. No new neurological deficits were detected after the surgeries.
Our results show that remimazolam-based anaesthesia may be a safe alternative to propofol-based anaesthesia for surgeries with an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, or patients with propofol contraindications but more data are needed.

PMID:
42444469
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement