Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Influence of coil number on the retention strength of ureteral stents: an experimental investigation.

Created on 14 Jul 2026

Authors

Achmad Syaifudin, Mohammad R A Moravi, Maulana Y Izzuddin, Zulaikha N Pangestu, Lukman Hakim, Mudhita Z Ritonga, Amaliya Rasyida, Siti Nurkhamiddah, Katsuhiko Sasaki

Published in

Physical and engineering sciences in medicine. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

Ureteral stents are temporary implantable devices used to maintain urinary drainage and prevent obstruction. Most designs incorporate pigtail coils to reduce migration; however, the contribution of terminal coil configuration to retention strength remains unclear. This study evaluated the retention behavior of five commercially available Double-J ureteral stents commonly used in Indonesia, representing different intended indwelling durations and terminal coil configurations. Stent length, outer diameter, inner diameter, material, angular sweep, and estimated coil number were recorded. Terminal coil number was estimated from available pre-test photographs using manual image-based angular sweep analysis. Specimens were immersed in artificial urine for one month and tested according to ASTM F1828-22 using a custom pull-out device. 1.5 coil stents showed higher mean retention forces (0.061-0.065 N) than 1 coil stents (0.010-0.034 N). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among stent types (F = 72.76, p = 4.665 × 10-10). However, because the tested specimens differed in material and geometry, the observed differences should be interpreted as the combined effect of coil configuration and associated stent design rather than coil number alone. These findings represent comparative in vitro retention behavior and should not be interpreted as direct clinical thresholds for migration prevention.

PMID:
42446840
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement