Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The comparison of biomechanical and histological findings of cadaveric temporal fascia and dura mater grafts.

Created on 14 Jul 2026

Authors

Onurhan Güven, Zeliha Kurtoğlu Olgunus, Orhan Beger, Rabia Bozdoğan Arpacı, Ülkü Çömelekoğlu, Gözde Arslan, Pourya Taghipour, Yusuf Vayısoğlu, Derya Ümit Talas

Published in

Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA. Volume 48. Issue 1. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and compare the biomechanical and histological characteristics of temporal fascia (TF) and dura mater grafts (DM); both obtained from adult human cadavers preserved in 10% formalin solution.
TF and DM samples (bilateral, n = 3 strips per tissue) were obtained from 12 adult human cadavers (6 males, 6 females, age 46-86, mean 73) preserved in 10% formalin solution. Biomechanical tensile test was used to measure the maximum force, stiffness, energy absorption, and maximum deformation, maximum stress, maximum strain, elastic (Young's) modulus, and toughness. Histological analysis assessed collagen and elastic fiber densities using standard staining methods via Pentachrome, Masson Trichrome and Verhoeff staining.
The elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and toughness were higher in formalin-fixed temporalis fascia than in formalin-fixed dura mater, indicating a stiffer material behavior. Histologically, collagen fiber and elastic fiber densities of grafts were similar.
Formalin-fixed temporal fascia exhibited higher stiffness and tensile strength than formalin-fixed dura mater, likely due to fixation-induced structural alterations rather than differences in elastic fiber content.

PMID:
42446739
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement