Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Screening of Hepatitis C virus in blood donors over 11 years].

Created on 15 Jul 2026

Authors

José Luis Rodríguez-Rivera, Alondra Daniel-Cravioto, Gamaliel Benítez-Arvizu

Published in

Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Volume 64. Issue 4. Pages e7025. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

HCV infection remains a global concern due to its often asymptomatic course and the potential for transfusion transmission during the window period. In this setting, nucleic acid testing (NAT) can detect early viremia that is not yet identifiable by serology, thereby strengthening blood safety.
To quantify HCV NAT yield (NAT-reactive donations with non-reactive anti-HCV serology, consistent with window-period detection) in blood donors using combined NAT and serology over an 11-year period.
Cross-sectional, observational study including 568,569 donations recorded at the CMN Siglo XXI Blood Bank (2014-2025). NAT and serology results were analyzed in accordance with NOM-253-SSA1-2012 to identify donations with a NAT-reactive/serology-non-reactive pattern.
One NAT-reactive/serology-non-reactive case was identified, consistent with window-period infection. The NAT yield rate was 0.18 per 100,000 donations (1.8 per million). No risk factors or coinfections were reported, indicating that serology alone would have missed the infection. Because only one case was documented over 11 years, population-level inferences and epidemiologic impact estimates are not supported.
In a large cohort within a very low-frequency setting, NAT identified a potentially infectious donation that serology did not detect. Although the absolute yield was low, each detected case is relevant to transfusion safety. Expanding NAT coverage and strengthening voluntary donation are recommended to optimize transfusion safety in Mexico.

PMID:
42447287
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement