Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Subsequent CAR-T and engineered antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma following BCMA-targeted treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Created on 15 Jul 2026

Authors

Yun Kang, Qiaolin Liu, Lin Liu, Wei Xie, Chunyan Sun, Heng Mei

Published in

Blood cancer journal. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

Relapse following B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies represents a critical challenge in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies (n = 1280) published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate salvage CAR-T versus engineered antibody therapies post-BCMA exposure. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 60%. CAR-T therapy achieved significantly superior ORR compared to antibody-based approaches (77% vs 52%; p < 0.0001), with comparable complete response rates. While incidences of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were similar, grade ≥3 cytopenias were more frequent with CAR-T. Notably, GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T yielded higher ORRs than BCMA-targeted constructs (86% vs 66%; p = 0.0006). Furthermore, patients with prior exposure to BCMA bispecific antibodies exhibited lower response rates compared to those with prior CAR-T exposure (71% vs 86%; p = 0.0404). In addition, studies with a median interval of ≥10 months demonstrated significantly higher ORRs than those with <10 months (70% vs 50%; p = 0.0146). In conclusion, GPRC5D CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy to engineered antibodies in the post-BCMA setting. These findings support prioritising earlier CAR-T use and underscore the importance of antigen selection in optimising treatment sequencing.

PMID:
42448658
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement