Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Thermodynamic characterisation of covalent ligand binding.

Created on 15 Jul 2026

Authors

Rebecca Hertzman, Maayan Lavie, Almog Nadir, Ronen Gabizon, Nir London

Published in

British journal of pharmacology. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) is a common and straightforward method to evaluate the thermal stability of proteins and has been heavily used for ligand binding characterisation as well as for screening. One class of compounds that is less typically evaluated by DSF are covalent binders. Here, we assessed the contribution of the covalent bond to protein thermal stabilisation.
We evaluated selective covalent binders, as well as non-selective reactive electrophiles, against five model protein targets. To assess DSF in the context of fragment-based electrophile screening, we compared DSF measurements to covalent labelling over a subset of electrophilic fragments.
We show that, in the context of selective binders, the formation of the covalent bond increases thermal stabilisation. However, it is not the covalent bond itself that stabilises the protein, because non-selective irreversible binding was typically neutral or, more often, destabilised the protein. In the context of fragment screening, the magnitude of the thermal shift tended to increase with irreversible labelling, whereas the more reactive fragments tended to destabilise the protein.
Taken together, we suggest DSF as a complementary approach to triage covalent fragment hits, in which fragments that show both labelling and protein stabilisation are predicted to display molecular recognition driven binding and serve as more productive starting points for covalent ligand development.

PMID:
42448449
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement