Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Relationship between apolipoprotein A levels and chronic kidney disease stage 4-5 in Chinese type 2 diabetes participants.

Created on 15 Jul 2026

Authors

Feifei Lou, Yao Li

Published in

International urology and nephrology. Jul 15, 2026. Epub Jul 15, 2026.

Abstract

Current evidence regarding the association between apolipoprotein A (ApoA) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4-5 in the Chinese population is scarce. Clarifying this relationship holds critical clinical significance for public health interventions. This study aimed to evaluate whether ApoA levels are associated with CKD stage 4-5 in type 2 diabetes patients.
This cross-sectional study included T2DM patients with CKD from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (2017-2018), using data from the Dryad database. Logistic regression, smooth-curve fitting, and subgroup analyses were performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) and doubly robust tests were used to validate the findings.
A total of 503 individuals were included in the study after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Higher ApoA levels were associated with older age, longer diabetes duration, and worse lipid profiles. Multivariable regression showed an independent inverse association: compared with T1, highest ApoA (T3) was associated with 87% lower odds of prevalent CKD (OR = 0.13, 95%CI 0.03-0.51, p = 0.003). No significant interactions were found for age, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) duration and presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) (p for interaction > 0.05). These associations persisted after PSM and doubly robust analyses.
Higher serum ApoA levels were independently correlated with a lower odds of advanced CKD stages 4-5 in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.

PMID:
42455413
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement