Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Diversity-oriented synthesis and study of triazole-fused bicyclic iminosugars.

Created on 16 Jul 2026

Authors

Pramodh Rao N, Juby K Ajish, K S Ajish Kumar

Published in

Organic & biomolecular chemistry. Jul 15, 2026. Epub Jul 15, 2026.

Abstract

Triazole-fused bicyclic iminosugars were synthesized from D-glucose using a Cu-free intramolecular azide-alkyne cycloaddition (IAAC)-derived tetracyclic diversity-oriented synthetic scaffold. This scaffold was used as a common intermediate for the synthesis of iminosugars that differ from known glycosidase inhibitors by the addition of a nitrogen atom within the triazole and pyranose rings. To make the synthesis efficient, this synthetic strategy employs the use of multiple one-pot multi-step chemical transformations and water as a solvent/co-solvent in the key synthetic transformations. Molecular docking studies revealed that a few of the synthesized compounds exhibit strong interaction with glycosidases (up to -10.1 kcal mol-1), suggesting potential inhibitory activity. This was supported by enzymatic assays against seven glycosidases, where four triazole-fused bicyclic iminosugars showed inhibition (IC50: 0.17-0.54 mM), demonstrating partial correlation with docking studies. Among the four systems, a tetracyclic C-5 azido compound 13 showed significant inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-mannosidase (Ki = 0.08-0.21 mM). Interestingly, although the cytotoxicity studies did not correlate with the enzyme inhibition data, compounds 17 and 19 showed selective activity (IC50: 0.13-0.5 mM) against cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, PC3 and WRL68. These findings suggest distinct mechanisms of action and identify promising separate leads for enzymatic and anticancer applications.

PMID:
42455919
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement