Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative pH-Responsive Loading and Release of Structurally Distinct Central Nervous System Drugs from Graphene Oxide.

Created on 16 Jul 2026

Authors

Kashfia Nawrin, Ken-Ichi Yano, Yuki Tanaka, Md Saidul Islam, Hafijul Islam, Yoshihiro Sekine, Shinya Hayami

Published in

ACS applied bio materials. Jul 15, 2026. Epub Jul 15, 2026.

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) has emerged as a versatile nanocarrier owing to its large surface area and rich surface chemistry; however, systematic studies correlating drug physicochemical properties with loading and release behavior remain limited, particularly for central nervous system (CNS) therapeutics. Herein, we present a comparative investigation of pH-responsive loading and release of two structurally distinct CNS drugs, d-cycloserine and riluzole, using graphene oxide as a common nanocarrier under identical experimental conditions. Drug loading efficiency and encapsulation efficiency were systematically evaluated as a function of pH, temperature, and initial drug concentration. GO exhibited a higher affinity for d-cycloserine, which is attributed to its greater polarity and hydrogen-bonding capability, whereas riluzole loading was primarily governed by π-π stacking and hydrophobic interactions. Both GO-drug systems displayed pronounced pH-responsive release behavior, with accelerated release under acidic conditions and sustained release at physiological pH. In vitro cytocompatibility studies using SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells demonstrated excellent biocompatibility for all formulations. This comparative study elucidates the critical role of drug chemistry in governing GO-drug interactions and provides design insights for graphene-based nanocarriers tailored for CNS drug delivery.

PMID:
42455754
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement