Agreement between household food insecurity access scale and an imputed food consumption score in urban Ethiopia: implications for targeting.

Authors

Bira Belay, Bereketabe Nega, Yalo Daba

Published in

BMC pediatrics. Jul 15, 2026. Epub Jul 15, 2026.

Abstract

The Food Consumption Score (FCS) and Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) measure different domains of food security, namely dietary diversity versus perceived access constraints. In urban Ethiopia, it is unknown whether these indicators classify the same households as food insecure. This study compared FCS and HFIAS classifications among households with young children and quantified discordance between the two measures.
This secondary analysis used cross-sectional data from 542 households with children aged 6-23 months attending public health centers in Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia (July-August 2024). The original study assessed determinants of animal-source food consumption; the current comparative analysis was a pre-specified secondary objective. FCS was calculated from 7-day food frequency data using standard WFP thresholds. Missing oil and sugar values (100% missing) were imputed as 3 days/week with sensitivity analyses under alternative assumptions. HFIAS categories used continuous score cutoffs validated in Ethiopian studies. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa, prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK), and discordance analysis. Bootstrap methods calculated 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of discordance.
FCS classified 34.5% as acceptable, 28.6% borderline, and 36.9% poor. HFIAS classified 20.1% as food secure, 28.0% mildly, 33.0% moderately, and 18.8% severely insecure. Overall agreement was 48.5% with kappa of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.25-0.37), indicating fair agreement. PABAK was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36-0.48). Discordance occurred in 51.5% of households: 22.9% were HFIAS-secure but FCS poor/borderline; 28.6% were HFIAS-insecure but FCS acceptable. Poorest wealth quintile (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.38-4.28) and no maternal education (AOR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.12-3.14) were independently associated with higher odds of discordance.
FCS and HFIAS measure different dimensions of household food security and demonstrate only fair agreement in this urban Ethiopian population. Neither measure alone provides a complete picture. The finding that more than half of households are discordantly classified highlights the importance of measuring both dietary consumption and perceived access whenever resources permit. The choice of indicator should be guided by assessment objectives and available resources.

PMID:
42458369
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.