Sex-based differences in ocular trauma: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.

Authors

Marah Eltiti, Omar Nusair, Mohammad Soleimani

Published in

Frontiers in public health. Volume 14. Pages 1814050. Epub Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

Ocular trauma is a major cause of preventable visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Although sex-based differences in ocular trauma have been reported, the evidence has not been comprehensively synthesized across mechanisms, injury patterns, severity, and outcomes.
We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis of studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. A structured search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, and reference lists of eligible articles were manually screened for additional studies. Original human epidemiologic or clinical studies were eligible if they focused on ocular trauma and reported sex-disaggregated data or direct comparisons between males and females relevant to epidemiology, mechanism, injury pattern, severity, management, or outcome. Reviews, meta-analyses, editorials, letters, conference abstracts, case reports, and mechanistic or preclinical studies were excluded from the formal review. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Forty-seven primary human studies met the inclusion criteria.
Males consistently accounted for most ocular trauma cases and were more likely to sustain occupational, sports-related, penetrating, and open-globe injuries, including intraocular foreign bodies, with greater posterior segment involvement and poorer visual outcomes. Females were more commonly represented in domestic, fall-related, blunt, and violence-related injuries. Boys showed higher pediatric injury rates, whereas older women were more vulnerable to fall-related trauma.
Ocular trauma shows clinically meaningful sex-based differences that may inform prevention, risk stratification, and patient management.

PMID:
42459484
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.