Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Intracavitary electrocardiography for 1‑Fr epicutaneous‑cava catheter tip location in neonates: 6‑Year retrospective study.

Created on 16 Jul 2026

Authors

Ausanio Gaetano, Mastroianni Rossella, Bernardo Italo

Published in

The journal of vascular access. Pages 11297298261465955. Jul 16, 2026. Epub Jul 16, 2026.

Abstract

Evidence for intracavitary electrocardiography (IC-ECG) to locate 1-Fr epicutaneous-cava catheter (ECC) tips in neonates remains limited.
We retrospectively analyzed 196 neonates (2019-2025) undergoing 1-Fr ECC insertion with IC-ECG guidance using either a conventional monitor-defibrillator (DEF) or a dedicated neonatal interface (Pilot™). Bedside echocardiography performed at the end of the procedure (within 2 h) served as the reference standard. Endpoints were applicability, feasibility, accuracy, malposition, and early complications (⩽24 h).
IC-ECG correctly identified catheter-tip position in 94.9% of cases under an intention-to-diagnose framework (186/196) and showed complete concordance with echocardiography in all evaluable catheters. Applicability was 100% (196/196; 95% CI 98.1-100.0). Feasibility (interpretable tracing) was 94.9% (186/196; 95% CI 90.8-97.5). Diagnostic accuracy was 94.9% under intention-to-diagnose (186/196; 95% CI 90.8-97.5) and 100% among interpretable tracings (186/186; 95% CI 98.0-100.0). In 10 cases, the tracing was neither readable nor interpretable, likely due to electrical interference. In three cases, the tracing was readable but the P-wave never reached a maximal amplitude throughout catheter navigation; ultrasound verification confirmed malposition. No clinically significant arrhythmias or occlusions occurred within 24 h.
IC-ECG provides excellent diagnostic performance for 1-Fr ECC tip location in neonates. A flat P-wave should prompt ultrasound confirmation. Multicenter studies are warranted.

PMID:
42460444
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement