Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Triple Clinical Filter Model for Selective Omission of Systematic Cores in Transperineal Cognitive Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Created on 17 Jul 2026

Authors

Muhammed Zübeyr Canbolat, İsa Dağlı, Tuncel Uzel, Abdullah Çayırlı, Abdullah Bolat, Erdem Öztürk

Published in

The Prostate. Jul 16, 2026. Epub Jul 16, 2026.

Abstract

To determine whether systematic biopsy can be safely omitted in selected patients undergoing antibiotic-free transperineal cognitive MRI-targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia, and to identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with cognitive biopsy superiority.
This retrospective study included patients who underwent antibiotic-free transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia. All patients had multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) visible lesions and received both systematic and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy. Targeted cores were obtained from all PI-RADS 4-5 lesions and from PI-RADS 3 lesions only when PSA density was ≥ 0.10 ng/mL/cm3. Cognitive biopsy non-inferiority was defined as an ISUP Grade Group equal to or higher than that obtained from systematic cores in the same patients. PSA density, MRI lesion size, and PI-RADS category were incorporated into a multivariable model to predict when systematic sampling would not add diagnostic value.
The multivariable model incorporating PSA density, MRI lesion size, and PI-RADS category demonstrated good discriminatory performance (AUC 0.881, sensitivity 92.6%, specificity 84.8%). In patients meeting all predefined model criteria, cognitive biopsy achieved concordant or superior grading in 95.2% of cases, whereas in those not meeting these criteria, systematic biopsy provided higher-grade detection in all cases within this subgroup.
In carefully selected patients with elevated PSA density, larger mpMRI visible lesions, and high PI-RADS scores, transperineal cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy may support the selective omission of systematic cores without compromising diagnostic reliability. In contrast, systematic sampling remains indispensable in lower-risk profiles, underscoring the value of a risk-adapted biopsy strategy.

PMID:
42462123
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement