Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Omitting catheterization after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Created on 17 Jul 2026

Authors

Ziyang Zheng, Ruixuan Zhu, Qi Zhang, Yan Zhuang, Anji Ren, Weiming Mou, Feng Sun, Jian Zhuo, Jun Da, Xiaolu Lun, Ranxing Yang, Jun Lu, Yongchuan Wang, Mei Kang, Yi Shao

Published in

World journal of urology. Volume 44. Issue 1. Jul 16, 2026. Epub Jul 16, 2026.

Abstract

To determine whether omitting routine indwelling catheterization after ureteroscopic lithotripsy reduces postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms and enhances patient comfort, without compromising safety.
In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 180 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy from August 2024 to June 2025 at four centers were allocated to either the No-Catheter group (n = 91) or the Catheter group (n = 89). The primary outcome was the incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) evaluated by the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for pain at 1 h, 4 h, 1 day postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included complications (fever and urinary retention) and distressing memories assessed at a 1-month follow-up using the Subjective Units of Distress Scale.
The No-Catheter group had significantly lower LUTS incidence at day 1 (9.9% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.012) and reduced urgency at 1 h and 4 h (p < 0.05). Fewer No-Catheter patients reported distressing LUTS memories at 1 month (7.7% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.001). Complication rates were comparable between groups (p > 0.05).
Omitting routine indwelling catheterization after ureteroscopic lithotripsy appears to be a safe strategy that significantly reduces postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms and improves the patient experience. These findings support a change in clinical practice away from routine catheterization.

PMID:
42461413
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement