Obstetric outcomes in pregnancies with solitary huge uterine fibroids: size versus type and location.

Authors

Simon Shenhav, Amit Shenhav, Gad Liberty, Adi Karni, Ori Abarbanel, Yaniv S Ovadia, Eyal Y Anteby

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 16, 2026. Epub Jul 16, 2026.

Abstract

Huge uterine fibroids represent a rare but clinically significant complication of pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate their impact on major obstetric outcomes and to determine whether fibroid type and anatomical location modify these risks. This retrospective observational study (2010-2023) compared 64 singleton pregnancies complicated by a single huge uterine fibroid (maximal diameter ≥ 10 cm) with 128 matched fibroid-free controls. Fibroids were classified sonographically by type and location. Outcomes included mode of delivery, gestational age (GA) at birth, preterm birth (PTB), neonatal birthweight, 5 min Apgar and maternal hemoglobin decline. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of cesarean delivery (CS). Among 57,200 pregnancies, huge uterine fibroid was identified in approximately 1 in 670 pregnancies (0.15%). These pregnancies were associated with higher rates of CS compared with controls (39.1% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.01), earlier GA (median 38.0 vs. 39.6 weeks, P < 0.01), a markedly increased rate of PTB (29.7% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.01), and greater maternal hemoglobin decline. Within the fibroid cohort, fibroid size relative to the median diameter was not associated with adverse outcomes. In contrast, intramural fibroids were strongly associated with both earlier GA and an increased risk of CS compared with subserosal lesions (adjusted OR 23.79, 95% CI 3.67-534.32, P < 0.01). Fibroids located in the lower uterine segment or cervix were also associated with elevated CS rates. Obstetric risk of pregnancies complicated by a huge solitary fibroid is driven primarily by fibroid type and anatomical location rather than size alone, supporting individualized counseling and delivery planning.

PMID:
42463719
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.