Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Development and external validation of an admission-based model for 180-day mortality in diabetic acute myocardial infarction.

Created on 17 Jul 2026

Authors

Yanlong Zhao, Haodong Jiang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Shuai Wang, Qicheng Yu, Jing Zeng, Shan Xie, Jiatong Li, Zhi Liu

Published in

Frontiers in endocrinology. Volume 17. Pages 1891663. Epub Jul 02, 2026.

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (DM-AMI) are at high risk, but risk heterogeneity within this subgroup remains insufficiently characterized. Whether a parsimonious admission-based model provides prognostic information beyond GRACE remains uncertain. We aimed to assess admission risk heterogeneity in DM-AMI and develop and externally validate a model for 180-day mortality using routine variables.
This retrospective dual-cohort study included AMI patients from a Beijing tertiary hospital (development cohort) and an ICU-based MIMIC-IV cohort (external validation). A Cox model was built using admission variables. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis with internal bootstrap validation and comparison with GRACE.
Among 4,167 patients, 1,514 had DM-AMI with 90 deaths at 180 days. The model included eight variables (age, heart rate, SBP, glucose, BUN, hemoglobin, RDW, WBC). It showed good discrimination in the development cohort (C-index 0.848; AUC 0.857) and maintained performance externally (AUC 0.744). GRACE comparison showed similar discrimination, while the combined model improved performance (ΔAUC = 0.014, P = 0.031). Calibration in MIMIC-IV indicated risk overestimation (slope 0.527; O/E 0.652).
DM-AMI patients exhibit marked admission risk heterogeneity. The model provides complementary prognostic information beyond GRACE but requires recalibration for absolute risk use in external settings.

PMID:
42466342
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement