Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A retrospective study on the rehabilitation effects of IMB nursing intervention for lung cancer patients after cryoablation.

Created on 18 Jul 2026

Authors

Huanzhi Peng, Lili Tang, Kai Wang, Manyuan Li, Li Tang, Quanxing Liu

Published in

Discover oncology. Jul 17, 2026. Epub Jul 17, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate whether an Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB)-based perioperative nursing program was associated with better self-efficacy, quality of life, complication profiles, and nursing satisfaction in patients with lung cancer undergoing cryoablation.
This single-center retrospective cohort study included 552 patients treated between July 2023 and March 2025. Patients received either IMB-based perioperative nursing (n = 268) or routine care (n = 284) according to routine clinical allocation rather than randomization. SUPPH and FACT-L scores were assessed at baseline and 3 months. Longitudinal changes were examined with repeated-measures models, and follow-up differences were further assessed with baseline-adjusted ANCOVA. Complications were compared with χ² or Fisher's exact tests and summarized with risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjusted logistic models were used for any complication, pneumothorax, and pain. Nursing satisfaction was compared with mean difference, 95% CI, and Cohen's d.
Baseline scores were similar between groups. At 3 months, the intervention group had higher SUPPH scores than the control group (104.66 ± 6.09 vs. 86.43 ± 4.35); the group-by-time interaction was 18.09 (16.96 to 19.22) (P < 0.001) and the baseline-adjusted mean difference was 18.23 (17.35 to 19.11) (P < 0.001). FACT-L scores also favored the intervention group (101.90 ± 12.72 vs. 94.57 ± 9.98), with a group-by-time interaction of 6.97 (4.93 to 9.01) (P < 0.001) and a baseline-adjusted mean difference of 7.34 (5.43 to 9.25) (P < 0.001). The overall complication rate was lower but not statistically significant (24 (9.0) vs. 37 (13.0); RR 0.69 (0.42 to 1.12); P 0.127). Pneumothorax (0.43 (0.22 to 0.85); P 0.012) and pain (0.51 (0.29 to 0.91); P 0.020) were significantly less frequent in the intervention group. Nursing satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (89.90 ± 1.84 vs. 78.06 ± 4.03; mean difference 11.83 (11.31 to 12.35); P < 0.001; Cohen's d = 3.74).
In this retrospective real-world study, IMB-based nursing was associated with better patient-reported outcomes and lower risks of pneumothorax and pain after cryoablation. Because the study was non-randomized and unblinded, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal and require prospective confirmation.

PMID:
42469552
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement