Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Estimating the heritability of longitudinal rate-of-change: genetic insights into PSA velocity in prostate cancer-free individuals.

Created on 18 Jul 2026

Authors

Pei Zhang, Xiaoyu Wang, Jianxin Shi, Paul S Albert

Published in

Biostatistics (Oxford, England). Volume 27. Issue 1. Jan 20, 2026.

Abstract

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used for prostate cancer screening. While the genetics of PSA levels have been studied to enhance screening accuracy, the genetic basis of PSA velocity, the rate of PSA change over time, remains unclear. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a large, randomized study with longitudinal PSA data (15,260 cancer-free males, averaging 5.34 samples per subject) and genome-wide genotype data, provides a unique opportunity to estimate PSA velocity heritability. We developed a mixed model to jointly estimate the heritability of PSA levels at age 54 and PSA velocity. To accommodate the large dataset, we implemented 2 efficient computational approaches: a partitioning and meta-analysis strategy using average information restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML) and a fast restricted Haseman-Elston (REHE) regression method. Simulations showed that both methods yield unbiased estimates of both heritability metrics, with AI-REML providing smaller variability in the estimation of velocity heritability than REHE. Applying AI-REML to PLCO data, we estimated heritability at 0.32 (s.e. = 0.07) for baseline PSA and 0.45 (s.e. = 0.18) for PSA velocity. These findings reveal a substantial genetic contribution to PSA velocity, supporting future genome-wide studies to identify variants affecting PSA dynamics and improve PSA-based screening.

PMID:
42470129
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement