Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

"The Disc Will Always Win!": Qualitative Pilot Study Findings on the Acceptability of Reusable Menstrual Products Among College Students on a U.S. Campus.

Created on 18 Jul 2026

Authors

Tsitsi B Masvawure, Remilekun Durodola

Published in

American journal of health promotion : AJHP. Pages 8901171261469375. Jul 17, 2026. Epub Jul 17, 2026.

Abstract

PurposeInterest in reusable menstrual products has expanded substantially over the last decade. However, there is limited published research on user experiences with these products in terms of their effectiveness in menstrual management. We assessed the acceptability of, and user experiences with, the menstrual disc-one of the newest types of reusable products-in terms of ease/difficulty of use (i.e., insertion, removal), leakages and overall comfort.Design/ApproachWe conducted a qualitative pilot study and provided students with menstrual discs to use over two menstrual cycles.SettingThe study was conducted on a mid-sized college campus in Massachusetts, U.S.ParticipantsWe recruited fourteen students who menstruate.MethodStudents completed two diary entries-one per menstrual cycle-about their experiences using the menstrual disc.ResultsThe menstrual disc was well received overall, and most students liked the long wear time, fewer changes required and the ability of the disc to self-empty. Although many students struggled with insertion initially, this improved with subsequent uses. Students noted that removal was easy but messy, which made changing in public bathrooms difficult. A few experienced major leakages when the disc became overfull. Almost all expressed willingness to use the disc as their main menstrual product.ConclusionThe menstrual disc potentially expands the range of more comfortable and convenient reusable menstrual products and should be included in reproductive health education.

PMID:
42470118
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 18 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement