Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity of four commercially available 5% sodium fluoride varnishes in HGF-1 gingival fibroblasts.

Created on 19 Jul 2026

Authors

Ayse Nur Parlakyildiz Gokce, Mustafa Gokce

Published in

BMC oral health. Jul 18, 2026. Epub Jul 18, 2026.

Abstract

This study compared in vitro cytotoxicity-related effects of four commercially available 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnishes (Enamelast®, Profluorid®, Polimo®, Proshield®) on human gingival fibroblast cells under standardized exposure conditions.
Varnish-derived supernatants were prepared using a standardized extraction approach and applied to HGF-1 cells at six concentrations ranging from 0.0625% to 2% for 24 h. Cell viability, membrane integrity, and migration were assessed using MTT, LDH release, and wound-healing assays, respectively. Experiments were performed in three independent biological replicates with technical triplicates. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test for concentration-response assays and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for migration analysis.
All four varnishes showed concentration-dependent adverse effects on HGF-1 cells. Polimo® showed the lowest IC₅₀ and the highest LDH release, indicating the least favorable in vitro profile among the tested materials. Enamelast® showed the highest IC₅₀ and a comparatively milder response, while Proshield® and Profluorid® showed an intermediate profile. All varnishes significantly reduced cell migration compared with untreated control cells.
The four tested 5% NaF varnishes showed different cytotoxicity-related response profiles in HGF-1 cells, with Polimo® showing the strongest adverse response and Enamelast.

PMID:
42471628
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement