Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Time-resolved phenotypic profiling maps EGFR and c-Met trafficking signatures.

Created on 19 Jul 2026

Authors

Kenji Tanabe

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 19, 2026. Epub Jul 19, 2026.

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met/MET) are receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) whose signalling depends on endocytic routing, and impaired down-regulation can drive tumour progression and therapy resistance, including MET-driven bypass of EGFR inhibition. However, how routing states couple to signalling and lipid programs, and how this differs between receptors under matched conditions, remains unclear. Using a chemically diverse annotated inhibitor library, we performed time-resolved, pathway-focused high-content imaging in A549 cells to compare co-varying phenotypes across matched EGFR and c-Met assay systems. Late receptor persistence defined operational degradation-inhibitor phenotypes that were heterogeneous and dispersed across a fused phenotypic atlas. Despite this heterogeneity, matched degradation-inhibitor sets showed receptor-selective lipid-trafficking coupling: EGFR persistence was associated with reduced phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-linked readouts and signalling biases, whereas c-Met persistence aligned with increased perinuclear phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate heterogeneity and altered transferrin-recycling readouts. These results provide a comparative imaging framework for mapping RTK trafficking states and nominate phosphoinositide-linked features as candidate readouts of trafficking rewiring in cancer-relevant contexts.

PMID:
42471366
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement