Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Overall survival according to timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors administration in patients with advanced cancer: results from a large single-centre cohort analysis.

Created on 19 Jul 2026

Authors

Tommaso Bosetti, Oliver John Kennedy, Raffaele Califano, Tom Waddell, Rob Metcalf, Sophia Kreft, Rebecca Lee, Paul Lorigan

Published in

British journal of cancer. Jul 18, 2026. Epub Jul 18, 2026.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment. Previous studies suggested that early time-of-day administration is associated with better outcomes. We performed a retrospective study in patients treated at a large tertiary cancer centre.
Patients receiving ICIs between January 2018 and December 2023 were grouped according to whether they had ≥50% ("late group") or <50% ("early group") of cycles after the median time of all treatments. The endpoint was overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models with and without time-dependent variables.
2631 patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer (45%), melanoma (23%), renal carcinoma (18%), head and neck (9%), and urothelial cancer (5%) were included. Median age was 68.2 years and median infusion time was 12:49 h. At a median follow-up of 32 months, median OS was 13.1 (95% CI 11.8-14.4) vs 21.4 (19.8-24.5) months for late and early group. Late group was associated with shorter OS on both the standard analysis (HR 1.48, 1.33-1.63) and the time-dependent model (HR 1.30, 1.16-1.44).
This study provides further evidence in favour of early ICIs administration with a large sample size and a time-dependent model, which reduces the risk of immortal time bias. Data from randomised trials are required to confirm these findings.

PMID:
42471484
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement