Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multifactorial influences on lung function in farmers: personal, occupational, and health-related factors.

Created on 19 Jul 2026

Authors

Patchareeya Amput, Ajchamon Thammachai, Saisunee Konsanit, Patcharin Phrompao, Sirima Wongphon

Published in

Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes. Pages 1-6. Jul 19, 2026. Epub Jul 19, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to identify personal, occupational, and health-related factors associated with lung function among farmers. A total of 102 farmers were recruited. Participants were assessed for personal characteristics (sex, age, height, weight, body mass index; BMI), occupational characteristics (pesticide use and duration of pesticide use), and health-related information, including exercise habits, underlying medical conditions, history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (timing and duration), and COVID-19 vaccination history. Lung function outcomes included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio. For FVC (% predicted), increasing age was associated with lower FVC (B = -0.302, p = 0.033). For FEV1 (% predicted), female sex was associated with lower FEV1 compared with male sex (B = -6.167, p = 0.037), and a history of COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced FEV1 (B = -8.573, p = 0.002). For FEV1/FVC (% predicted), a history of COVID-19 infection was associated with a lower ratio (B = -7.320, p = 0.026). A history of COVID-19 infection is associated with reduced lung function, reflected in both lung volume (FVC) and airflow (FEV1), and it may also be related to a lower FEV1/FVC ratio. In addition, age and BMI were contributors to lower.

PMID:
42472369
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement