Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

From biomarker expansion to equitable implementation in mild cognitive impairment.

Created on 20 Jul 2026

Authors

Mashal Khan, Talha Khan, Ayesha Tariq

Published in

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. Volume 47. Issue 8. Jul 20, 2026. Epub Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

The expanding role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis represents a major shift toward biologically driven dementia care. In response to the article by Poli et al., we discuss important considerations regarding the broader implementation of CSF biomarker testing in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), particularly in the era of emerging anti-amyloid therapies. While biomarker-guided approaches may improve identification of atypical or non-amnestic Alzheimer's disease presentations, widespread adoption remains limited by disparities in diagnostic infrastructure, standardized testing availability, expertise in lumbar puncture procedures, and longitudinal monitoring capacity across healthcare systems. In addition, expanded eligibility for anti-amyloid therapies introduces challenges related to patient selection, treatment accessibility, and equitable allocation of healthcare resources. Ethical considerations surrounding biomarker disclosure and prognostic uncertainty also warrant continued discussion. We emphasize the need for future studies evaluating accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and standardized patient selection frameworks to support equitable integration of biomarker-guided dementia care into routine neurological practice.

PMID:
42472714
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement