Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Tooth Loss During Supportive Periodontal Care (SPC): A Three Decades Retrospective Study in a University Setting.

Created on 20 Jul 2026

Authors

M Cyris, P Bartels, M Kahl, C Springer, S Sälzer, K Fawzy El-Sayed, C E Dörfer, Li-Li Zhou, C Graetz

Published in

Journal of clinical periodontology. Jul 19, 2026. Epub Jul 19, 2026.

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study evaluate tooth loss and predictors during exceptionally long term supportive periodontal care (SPC), focusing on residual disease severity at SPC initiation.
Seventy patients maintained under SPC for > 30 years were analysed using negative binomial regression (log[SPC-duration] offset) and Cox proportional hazards models (clustered by patient).
Over a mean SPC duration of 36.1 ± 3.0 [30-43] years, 63 patients lost 322 teeth (4.6 ± 4.2 per patient; 0.13 ± 0.12 per patient-year). Despite advanced baseline disease (stage III/IV: 97%), 35-year molar survival was 77% for FI 0 versus 51% for FI II-III. Tooth loss rate was significantly associated with PPD ≥ 6 mm (IRR 1.012; 95% CI 1.003-1.021; p = 0.009) and molar FI II-III (IRR 1.178; 95% CI 1.050-1.321; p = 0.005). A tooth-level Cox model confirmed elevated hazard for PPD ≥ 6 mm (HR 4.02; 95% CI 2.10-7.69) and FI II-III (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.61-5.11). However, predictive accuracy was modest (PPV 36%-55%), indicating these markers reflect population-level risk rather than individual prognosis.
Tooth loss remained low over > 30 years of SPC even for molars with advanced FI, while residual disease severity modulated this risk. Given strong survivorship bias (3.3% of eligible patients), generalisability beyond university-based specialist care is limited.

PMID:
42472646
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement