Shear behavior of UHPFRC deep beams with internal opening reinforcement.

Authors

Ahmed M Yousef, Ahmed M Tahwia, Ali A Elzain

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 19, 2026. Epub Jul 19, 2026.

Abstract

This study experimentally and numerically investigated the shear behavior of UHPFRC deep beams with internal-opening reinforcement, focusing on how internal-opening reinforcement detailing can mitigate opening-induced shear capacity loss. The test program included eight simply supported UHPFRC deep beams tested under four-point loading and arranged into two groups with different geometries. Group I comprised five beams with an a/d ratio of 0.61, including one solid reference beam and four beams with a square opening within the shear span, and intersected the load path. Group II comprised three beams with an a/d ratio of 0.79 and different opening sizes. Three internal opening reinforcement techniques with different ratios were examined: (1) additional vertical and horizontal bars around the opening (µ_av = µ_ah = 2.7% or 2.4%), (2) additional stirrups (ρ_va = 4.2% or 5.6%) with vertical and horizontal bars around the opening (µ_av = µ_ah = 2.7% or 2.4%), and (3) diagonal cross-bars around the opening (µ_ax = 1.8%). The results showed that the unreinforced opening reduced the cracking load by 41.4% and the ultimate load by 40.4%, compared with the solid beam. Techniques (1), (2), and (3) increased ultimate shear capacity by 16.5%, 69.2%, and 25.3%, respectively, versus the unreinforced opening beam, achieving approximately 54.6%, 79.4%, and 58.8% recovery of the solid-beam capacity. A 3D numerical model using concrete damage plasticity reproduced damage and load-deflection responses, with mean experimental-to-numerical ratios of 1.08 for ultimate shear load and 1.30 for midspan deflection, supporting the model's predictive reliability for deep beams with internal opening reinforcement.

PMID:
42472981
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.