Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Retrospective Case Series From a Tertiary Care Center.

Created on 20 Jul 2026

Authors

Shishir Kumar, Ratan Kumar, Mrunalkant Panchal, Preeti Srivastava, Sanjay K Tanti

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 6. Pages e111125. Epub Jun 18, 2026.

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a challenging neonatal surgical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Thoracoscopic repair has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional open repair in selected patients.
The aim of this study is to share our experience in the surgical management of CDH and to compare postoperative outcomes between thoracoscopic repair and open laparotomy.
A retrospective analysis of six patients with CDH managed surgically at a tertiary care center was performed. Demographic data, antenatal diagnosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), surgical approach, ventilator requirement, initiation of enteral feeding, duration of analgesia, hospital stay, and follow-up outcomes were evaluated.
All patients had left-sided Bochdalek hernias. Three patients underwent thoracoscopic repair, and three underwent open laparotomy. Thoracoscopic repair was associated with a reduced ventilator requirement, earlier initiation of enteral feeds, shorter duration of intravenous analgesia, and reduced hospital stay. One mortality occurred in the laparotomy group. No patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or patch repair.  Conclusion: Thoracoscopic repair of CDH, when performed in carefully selected patients, is safe and associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes compared to open repair.

PMID:
42473496
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement