Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Short- and long-term outcomes of conversion surgery for gastric cancer with massive peritoneal metastasis: a single-center retrospective study.

Created on 20 Jul 2026

Authors

Shinta Tominaga, Junya Kitadani, Keiji Hayata, Taro Goda, Tomoki Nakai, Shotaro Nagano, Naoki Fukuda, Manabu Kawai

Published in

Surgery today. Jul 20, 2026. Epub Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

The role of conversion surgery for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis is unclear and there are no reliable biomarkers. We evaluated the outcomes of conversion surgery and the predictive value of inflammatory and nutritional markers.
The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 65 patients with massive peritoneal metastasis (P1b or P1c) from among 102 gastric cancer patients with positive peritoneal cytology or peritoneal metastasis, diagnosed by staging laparoscopy. We investigated the association between inflammatory and nutritional markers before treatment, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), the prognostic nutritional index; and the feasibility of conversion surgery.
Conversion surgery was performed after chemotherapy in 14 of the 65 patients. Median survival was longer in the conversion surgery group than in the non-surgery group (30 vs. 9 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified conversion surgery (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.60) and mGPS 0 (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.65) as independent prognostic factors. Patients with mGPS 0 were significantly more likely to undergo conversion surgery (P = 0.026).
Conversion surgery may be associated with improved survival for gastric cancer patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. Moreover, mGPS may be a useful biomarker as a prognostic or selection-related factor.

PMID:
42474772
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement