Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The efficacy of antidepressant medication versus interpersonal psychotherapy for depression in middle-aged women: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Created on 20 Jul 2026

Authors

Sanne N E van Haaren, Zachary D Cohen, Jasmijn Breunese, Frederik J Wienicke, John C Markowitz, Erica S Weitz, Steven D Hollon, Dillon T Browne, Paula Rucci, Carolina Corda, Marco Menchetti, Myrna M Weissman, R Michael Bagby, Lena C Quilty, Marc B J Blom, Mario Altamura, Ingo Zobel, Elisabeth Schramm, Carlos Gois, Jos W R Twisk, Pim Cuijpers, Ellen Driessen

Published in

Archives of women's mental health. Volume 29. Issue 4. Jul 20, 2026. Epub Jul 20, 2026.

Abstract

Depression is highly prevalent in middle-aged women (MAW), but head-to-head comparisons of first-line interventions in this population are scarce. This systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis examined the comparative efficacy of antidepressant medication (ADM) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for MAW (aged 40-64) versus other adults (men and non-MAW) on depression, quality of life, and interpersonal problem measures.
PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched January 1, 2025 to identify randomized trials comparing ADM and IPT for adults with depression. IPD were requested and analyzed using mixed-effects models.
IPD were obtained from 9 of the 15 (60%) identified studies, comprising 1,490 participants (527 MAW, 963 other adults). MAW status did not significantly moderate ADM versus IPT comparative efficacy on depression (p = .10) and interpersonal problems (p = .29) outcomes. The two treatments did not significantly differ in treatment effect in the MAW group (depression: b = -0.03, p = .76; interpersonal problems: b = -0.20, p = .31). MAW status significantly moderated comparative efficacy on quality of life measures (b = 0.37, p = .02). Whereas IPT was non-significantly more efficacious than ADM for MAW (b = -0.18, p = .15), ADM were non-significantly more efficacious than IPT for other adults (b = 0.19, p = .051).
This is the first IPD meta-analysis directly comparing depression treatments in MAW. The absence of treatment effect differences indicates that other factors (e.g., patient preference) may guide choice between IPT and ADM in this population.

PMID:
42474552
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement