Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Integrated bioinformatics and experimental analysis identify apoptosis- and pyroptosis-related hub genes as candidate diagnostic biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

Created on 21 Jul 2026

Authors

Yawen Cai, Yifan Chen, Guiqin Huang, Menghui Ren, Yuhui Chai, Cong Gai, Xi Huang, Tianhua Yan

Published in

Journal of applied genetics. Jul 21, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

Apoptosis and pyroptosis-mediated neuronal death represent major pathogenic mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD). Given the potential crosstalk between these two forms of cell death, investigation of a single death pathway may be insufficient to identify robust diagnostic biomarkers for AD. Therefore, this study aimed to explore hub genes involved in both apoptosis and pyroptosis as potential diagnostic biomarkers for AD. First, 23 common cell death-related genes (CDRGs) were identified through bioinformatic analysis. Functional enrichment analyses using GO, KEGG, and GeneMANIA revealed significant associations between AD and biological processes including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and neuronal death. Subsequently, machine learning algorithms combined with ROC curve analysis identified CASP3, IL1B, NLRP3, and PYCARD as candidate biomarkers with potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications for AD. These findings were further validated by the in vitro experiments, which confirmed that the expression levels of these four biomarkers were consistent with the predicted results. Additionally, in patients with AD, CASP3, IL1B, NLRP3, and PYCARD were negatively correlated with macrophages. Collectively, these results suggest that the identified biomarkers may co-regulate apoptosis and pyroptosis through macrophages, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of AD.

PMID:
42479414
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 21 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement