Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cost of managing brain metastases in patients with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the UK.

Created on 22 Jul 2026

Authors

Hannah Le, Daniel Ladino, Chrissy Lowry, Nada Rifi, Shobhit Baijal

Published in

Lung cancer management. Volume 15. Issue 1. Pages 2696220. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the NHS costs of managing patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), with and without brain metastases. Patients were treated with first-line (1 L) ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
We built an economic model to estimate the annual costs of managing ALK+ aNSCLC patients with and without brain metastases using estimated NHS health care resource use (HCRU) consumption. The ALK TKIs included in our model were lorlatinib, crizotinib, alectinib and brigatinib. We based our estimates on the cumulative incidence of brain metastases in four clinical trials - CROWN, ALEX, ALESIA and ALTA-1L.
For the first year of treatment, our model estimated the annual cost of managing patients with brain metastases to be £14,870. Patients without brain metastases cost £4,133. The NHS HCRU cost savings generated by treating patients with lorlatinib increased significantly over time and were greater in patients without brain metastases at the start of their treatment (at baseline) with lorlatinib. This reflects the prevention of brain metastases with 1 L lorlatinib.
The longitudinal cost data demonstrate that lorlatinib leads to potentially lower NHS management costs of brain metastases in patients with ALK+ aNSCLC.

PMID:
42480036
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement