Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Importance of antibody validation in detecting cell cycle regulatory protein p16 INK4A by immunohistochemistry on pancreas tissue.

Created on 22 Jul 2026

Authors

Jasmine Pipella, Peter J Thompson

Published in

Islets. Volume 18. Issue 1. Pages 2706228. Dec 31, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

p16INK4A is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that plays important roles in pancreatic islet beta-cell maturation, function, and senescence. As staining pattern consistency and reproducibility have been challenging in the field, our objective was to validate a monoclonal antibody for the detection of p16INK4A in mouse and human fixed pancreas sections.
Four commercial monoclonal antibodies reported to react against mouse p16INK4A were tested by fluorescent immunohistochemistry on positive and negative control formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pancreas sections from two different mouse strains. Lot-to-lot consistency was also evaluated. Fixed human donor pancreas sections were evaluated for reactivity with the monoclonal p16INK4A antibody that performed best on mouse tissues.
One commercial monoclonal antibody robustly detected a nuclear antigen in both mouse and human pancreas sections, consistent with the previously reported p16INK4A staining pattern, and its role as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in beta cells. This antibody also showed lot-to-lot consistency in staining pattern.
Our findings highlight the importance of antibody validation for p16INK4A detection in mouse and human pancreas sections and suggest caution in using untested commercially available antibodies to this protein for immunohistochemistry of the pancreas.

PMID:
42480009
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement