Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Routine and event-driven HIV testing among MSM in Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional study on the moderating effect of anxiety.

Created on 22 Jul 2026

Authors

Hui Xiang, Rongrong Lu, Wei Sun, Xiaoqing Tang, Xinyu Hao, Chao Zhou, Fangfang Chen, Houlin Tang

Published in

AIDS care. Pages 1-14. Jul 21, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

HIV testing is critical for prevention and treatment among men who have sex with men (MSM). This study applied an extended Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) framework to examine HIV testing strategies among Chinese MSM, with anxiety acting as both a direct predictor and a moderator. A cross-sectional survey was conduted among 431 MSM recruited from venues and community-based organizations in Chongqing, China, from June to September 2025. Participants completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographics, sexual behaviors, HIV knowledge, IMB constructs, and anxiety (GAD-7). HIV testing strategies were categorized as routine testing (every 3, 6, or 12 months), event-driven testing (only when perceived necessary), and never testing. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with testing strategies. Overall, 67.1% reported annually testing. Personal motivation was associated with routine testing, whereas behavioral skills (self-testing) were associated with event-driven testing. Moderate anxiety directly predicted event-driven testing and modified the associated between HIV knowledge and testing stategy (P = 0.066). These findings highlight the need to integrate mental health considerations into HIV testing services and tailor interventions according to anxiety level.

PMID:
42480111
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement