Sustainable removal of methylene blue from water using three coffee waste types.

Authors

Julián Aguilar-Rosero, Ericka M Alejandre-García, Ulises Salazar-Kuri, Lilian I Olvera, Diana L Cárdenas-Chávez

Published in

RSC advances. Jul 22, 2026. Epub Jul 22, 2026.

Abstract

Since approximately 90% of the total weight of coffee fruit is not utilized during its commercial cycle, the coffee industry generates a massive amount of residues that affect environmental dynamics. This study explores an alternative use for three types of coffee waste (coffee husk CH, spent coffee SC and expired coffee EC) as efficient biosorbent materials for treating water contaminated with industrial dyes such as methylene blue (MB). Characterization was performed by analyzing their crystalline structures (XRD), thermal stability (TGA) and functional groups (FTIR), revealing that fat removal aligned crystalline domains enhancing mechanical integrity, while deprotonated carboxyl and hydroxyl groups drove electrostatic MB binding. Furthermore, the inherent content of lipids and proteins delayed the material decomposition. Raw and defatted coffee residues were exposed to two main treatments consisting of three stages with sequential exposure to alkaline and acid conditions, ethanol and H₂O₂, followed by a multi-phase processing for comparative analysis. The highest removal percentages were recorded for pretreated CH (98.14%) at pH 10 and 50 ppm of MB, no-pretreated SC (T1) at pH 5 and 50 ppm of MB (96.76%), and pretreated EC at pH 10 and 100 ppm of MB (98.48%). Adsorption kinetics indicated a pseudo-second-order mechanism and Sips isothermal model behavior, involving not only physisorption but also chemisorption on a heterogeneous surface with energetically distinct adsorption sites for all the coffee residues. Finally, a regeneration study using HCl as the desorption agent demonstrated a stable adsorption performance for up to 14 cycles at 50 ppm, particularly for coffee husk samples.

PMID:
42488818
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.