Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Perceiving surface reflectance requires attention.

Created on 23 Jul 2026

Authors

Erin Goddard, Kavita Paul Remician

Published in

Journal of vision. Volume 26. Issue 7. Pages 14. Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

Color constancy refers to our ability to distinguish changes in surface properties from changes in the properties of light illuminating the scene. The apparent ease with which we can tell that objects do not change in their surface properties, for example, when moving from sunlight to the shade, belies the complexity of solving this ill-constrained problem. Although there is a substantial body of work testing which image cues might be used to accomplish this, there is surprisingly little known about how the brain performs this computation. Here, we tested a fundamental aspect of the perceptual scission of surface reflectance from illuminant/filter properties: whether it requires attention. We measured visual search times for both surface reflectance (requiring separation of surface and illuminant properties) and local tristimulus value (which does not). We found a clear difference between the two: Visual search for color defined by tristimulus value was fast and near-parallel, while search for a particular surface reflectance was slow and consistent with the serial deployment of attention. That is, search times suggest that the perceptual separation of surface and illuminant or filter properties in scenes with spatially heterogeneous illuminants or filters may require an attention-based process analogous to perceiving conjunctions of simple features in "feature binding." These results offer important new insights into the sequence of processes the brain uses to accomplish color constancy.

PMID:
42490094
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement