Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A critical appraisal of "A novel survival prediction model after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era".

Created on 23 Jul 2026

Authors

Iqra Akhtar, Muhammad Hassaan Javaid

Published in

General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Jul 23, 2026. Epub Jul 23, 2026.

Abstract

Maeda et al. recently proposed a model to predict long-term survival after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) era. While the model shows encouraging discrimination and calibration, several methodological and clinical limitations may restrict its broader applicability. The authors selected the final six-variable model primarily on the basis of maximal five-year C-statistic, without formal sample size justification or contemporary shrinkage-based criteria. Validation was restricted to internal resampling within the same registry, limiting evidence for transportability. Important prognostic domains, notably frailty and key anatomical and comorbidity variables, were not incorporated, and performance was not directly compared with established risk scores. Reporting only partially aligns with modern prediction model guidelines and omits decision curve analysis, leaving clinical utility uncertain. Overall, the model represents a valuable step but requires methodological refinement and external validation before guiding lifetime management between SAVR and TAVR.EBM Rating: Level V evidence. The article represents expert opinion derived from the author's clinical experience and interpretation of existing literature, without original experimental, randomized, controlled, cohort, or comparative analytic data.

PMID:
42489797
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement