A systematic DoE approach for optimizing urinary LC-HRMS metabolomics: enhancing reliability in bladder cancer profiling.

Authors

Anastasiia Frolova, Mikhail Vokuev, Yurii Ikhalainen, Daria Prosuntsova, Igor Rodin

Published in

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

Untargeted urinary metabolomics presents significant challenges in analytical reproducibility and biological interpretation, particularly in the context of clinical oncology. This study presents a systematically optimized liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) workflow for bladder cancer (BCa) biomarker discovery. To address variability in sample preparation, a two-stage design of experiments (DoE) approach was applied to systematically optimize key parameters affecting metabolite extraction efficiency, thereby improving the reproducibility of subsequent non-invasive profiling. The performance of the workflow was evaluated through the systematic assessment of instrumental stability and injection precision using pooled quality control (QC) samples. Following peak picking and alignment, a comprehensive raw dataset of 15,344 metabolic signals was generated, leading to the putative identification of 854 compounds. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated reproducible instrumental performance, indicated by tight QC sample clustering. From the total clinical cohort of 107 patients, a demographically matched sub-cohort of 50 individuals was evaluated to suppress confounding physiological noise. This comparative model revealed distinct disease-specific clustering and demonstrated significant perturbations in the tryptophan metabolic axis, membrane lipid remodeling, and enhanced proteolytic activity, characterized by an evident peptide overflow, associated with BCa progression. This systematically optimized methodology provides a reliable analytical approach for identifying non-invasive diagnostic panels, supporting the implementation of efficient laboratory workflows aligned with Analytics 5.0 principles.

PMID:
42496706
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.