Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinical impact of the prognostic nutritional index at listing and immediately before surgery in lung transplantation.

Created on 24 Jul 2026

Authors

Shinji Yuhara, Gouji Toyokawa, Junichi Takada, Miho Yamaguchi, Yue Cong, Takaki Akamine, Masahiro Yanagiya, Takahiro Karasaki, Mitsuaki Kawashima, Chihiro Konoeda, Yan Luo, Masaaki Sato

Published in

Surgery today. Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is calculated from the serum albumin concentrations and lymphocyte counts, predicts the outcomes in lung transplantation (LT). This study aimed to investigate the optimal timing for assessing PNI before LT.
We analyzed 140 brain-dead LT recipients (2015-2023) in this study. The PNI was calculated at the time of transplant listing and immediately before LT. Using a cutoff value of 45, the patients were classified into high/low PNI groups and compared for overall survival. Changes in the PNI trajectories were analyzed.
Multivariable analyses showed that a low PNI independently predicted mortality at listing (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-5.53; P = 0.003) and before LT (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.25-4.77; P = 0.009). Patients with a persistently low PNI had a worse survival than those with a persistently high PNI (HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.62-7.91; P = 0.002), whereas an improvement in the PNI after listing was not significantly associated with survival.
PNI at both time points significantly predicted post-transplant outcomes. A trajectory analysis highlights the importance of nutritional assessment before listing, although larger studies are required to clarify the effects of nutritional changes after listing.

PMID:
42496893
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement