Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Timing in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Created on 25 Jul 2026

Authors

Chenliang Pan, Jing Zhao, Nan Bai, Juan Ma, Li Song, Jizhe Xu, Ming Bai

Published in

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992). Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

The optimal timing for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) initiation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) remains unclear. This study evaluated whether initiating VA-ECMO before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival compared with post-PCI initiation in patients with AMICS. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study using registry data from 113 patients with AMICS who received VA-ECMO. The patients were classified into ECMO pre-PCI (n = 72) and ECMO post-PCI (n = 41) groups. The 30-day mortality rate in the ECMO pre-PCI group (29.2%) was lower than that in the ECMO post-PCI group (61.0%) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.60; p < 0.001) and remained consistent across most subgroups. The ECMO pre-PCI group was also associated with lower in-hospital (27.8% vs. 61.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.48; p < 0.001), 180-day (36.1% vs. 63.4%; adjusted HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.65; p < 0.001), and 360-day (40.3% vs. 65.9%; adjusted HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66; p <0.001) mortality. In selected patients with AMICS, initiating VA-ECMO support before primary PCI may reduce short- and long-term mortality compared with initiating support after primary PCI. These findings highlight the potential significance of early hemodynamic stabilization and warrant further prospective studies.

PMID:
42497244
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement