Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A hybrid convolutional-transformer neural network model for photovoltaic fault detection and localization.

Created on 25 Jul 2026

Authors

Ebrahim A Ramadan, Nada M Moawad, Belal A Abouzalam, Wessam F Abouzaid, Ghada M El-Banby

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Issue 1. Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

Energy retention from losses is the primary goal of fault detection methodology for photovoltaic (PV) solar systems. A fault detection model should be designed effectively to minimize power and cost waste. We propose a novel fault detection and localization method that leverages deep learning techniques for PV systems. The model is a hybrid semantic segmentation method that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and multi-level transformer neural networks. We examine our model on four different segmentation datasets, which have varied characteristics and different capturing conditions, to ensure our model generalization. Using aerial inspection, the first thermal dataset images give a high performance in locating the faulty cells in PV arrays with an accuracy and global precision of 99.89%, a mean average precision (mAP) of 88.73%, a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 76.29%, and 84.48% of mean dice (mDice, or mean/unweighted F1 score). We use three electroluminescence datasets to investigate the precise location and class of different fault types and minor cracks at the cell level. The second dataset result achieved perfect detection and segmentation of anomaly areas in cells with 99% accuracy, 96.36% mIoU, 98.13% mDice, and 98.41% mAP. The first two datasets contain binary segmentation images with fault and no-fault classes; to accommodate multiple classes, we have utilized the third and fourth datasets. The third dataset, comprising five PV failure classes, is evaluated against other models, yielding a superior performance of 96.27% precision, 77.64% mAP, 57.3% mIoU, and 68.45% mDice. The final dataset has 29 segmentation classes for testing 25 classes, for which it achieves a precision of 95.05%, 66.7% mAP, 49.3% mIoU, and 59.3% mDice.

PMID:
42498772
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement