Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Evaluation and interpretation of Hawthorne and other trial-related effects in Celiac Disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Created on 25 Jul 2026

Authors

Dorina Pjetraj, Elena Lionetti, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Rosaria Gesuita, Carlo Catassi

Published in

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. Jul 24, 2026. Epub Jul 24, 2026.

Abstract

The Hawthorne effect describes outcome changes driven by awareness of observation rather than active intervention. In celiac disease (CeD), improvements reported in placebo or control arms suggest that observation may influence objective outcomes. We aimed to analyze the Hawthorne and other trial-related effects in treated CeD, focusing on histological changes of the small intestinal mucosa.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to October 2025 for studies enrolling patients with CeD on a gluten-free diet (GFD) reporting outcomes in placebo or control arms. Outcomes were synthesized qualitatively, and by a random-effects meta-analysis of pooled within-group changes in villous height-crypt depth (Vh/Cd) ratio.
Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and three studies (168 participants) provided histological data. Placebo or control groups showed improvements in symptoms, dietary adherence markers, and mucosal morphology. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant increase in Vh/Cd ratio (median difference +0.25; 95% CI 0.11-0.39; p < 0.001) with low heterogeneity. This improvement suggests significant gluten contamination of the pre-trial GFD.
In treated CeD, structured monitoring is associated with meaningful histological improvement independent of active intervention, that should be considered when interpreting trial outcomes.

PMID:
42498599
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement