Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines and technical operation norms in acupuncture and moxibustion: Evaluation using AGREE II and STAR.

Authors

Pei Yong Loh, Dongsheng Ba, Xue Zhao, Xinru Yuan, Xiaoyan Lyu, Jiani Ma, Hui Zhang, Changqi Li, Xinyang Li, Moran Hei, Zecheng Xu, Huie Ma, Leilin Liu, Yiru Li, Tianyi Zhao, Zelin Chen, Xu Wang, Yaolong Chen, Yang Guo, Yi Guo, Bo Chen

Published in

Integrative medicine research. Volume 15. Issue 3Part A. Pages 101307. Epub Jan 25, 2026.

Abstract

The methodological quality of current acupuncture and moxibustion clinical practice guidelines and technical operation norms remain unclear. Given their potential impact on clinical decision-making and health policy, this study aimed to evaluate their quality using the AGREE II and STAR tools, and to explore the need for a tailored appraisal tool for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) technical operation norms.
A methodological evaluation was conducted using standardized appraisal instruments. A systematic search across 14 databases identified guidelines and norms related to acupuncture and moxibustion published up to December 31, 2025. Two independent reviewers assessed the included documents using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and Scientific, Transparent, Applicable Rating (STAR) tools.
Seventy-six publications were included: 31 clinical practice guidelines and 45 technical operation norms. AGREE II results showed that 29 guidelines scored >50% in 4 out of 6 domains, while 7 norms met the criterion. STAR evaluation showed an overall score of 64.4% for guidelines versus 15.3% for norms.
This study found that acupuncture and moxibustion clinical practice guidelines generally demonstrate moderate methodological quality, whereas technical operation norms consistently show low scores across multiple domains, indicating substantial room for improvement. These findings also suggest that commonly used appraisal tools, such as AGREE II and STAR, may not fully capture the unique characteristics of TCM technical documents. Future work should develop TCM-specific appraisal tools and improve implementation.

PMID:
42500458
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.