Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Identifying and characterizing the germinal genetic landscape of men with prostate cancer: A real-life, retrospective, multicenter study.

Created on 26 Jul 2026

Authors

Ran Svirsky, Batya Sonnenfeld, Inbal Kedar, Miora Linial, Noy Azulay, Adi Sharabi-Nov, Hadar Shalev, Yael Goldberg

Published in

Genetics in medicine open. Volume 4. Pages 104406. Epub May 27, 2026.

Abstract

Genetic factors play a role in prostate cancer (PCa) development. This real-life, retrospective, multicenter study aimed to identify and characterize the germline genetic testing landscape in men with PCa and to assess the added benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing compared with testing for founder disease-causing variants.
This study included all men who were referred for genetic counseling because of PCa. All patients were offered germline genetic testing. Demographic, clinical, and pathological information was retrieved from their medical records. Variant classification was determined using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.
Of the 293 men with PCa tested, in 39 (13.3%), a positive genetic finding (pathogenic variant, likely pathogenic, or risk variant) was reported: 18 (6.1%) men had a positive test result for high-penetrance genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, NF1, and MSH6), and 21 (7.2%) had risk allele variants. One-third (33%) of the disease-causing or likely disease-causing variants identified through NGS in our PCa cohort were unique rather than founder variants. The only significant correlation between positive results and demographic or clinical factors was observed between a positive test result and a family history of cancer.
Our findings underscore the importance of NGS genetic investigations in patients with PCa, regardless of ethnicity or disease stage.

PMID:
42502690
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement