Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Temporal Misalignment and Unequal Agency: What Terminal Cancer Patients Teach Us about Time and Inequality.

Created on 26 Jul 2026

Authors

Zhuofan Li, Daniel Dohan, Corey M Abramson

Published in

American sociological review. Volume 91. Issue 4. Pages 545-571. Epub Jun 09, 2026.

Abstract

This article examines how time both exacerbates and destabilizes existing inequality by stratifying agency. Drawing on five years of fieldwork in nine cancer clinics and 196 in-depth interviews with 96 patients navigating a terminal cancer diagnosis toward the end of life, we show the centrality of "temporal misalignment"-a mismatch between the temporalities enacted by individual actions and those imposed by institutional contexts structuring when and how action is possible. A combination of ethnographic data and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) reveals how effective use of resources requires cancer patients to (1) triage conflicting demands of treatment, work, family, and bureaucratic schedules; (2) reconcile mismatched trajectories of disease progression and healthcare institutions; and (3) anchor uncertain decisions at present in an anticipatable future. These efforts to manage temporal misalignment not only reproduce resource disparities, but also create new, imminent, and often embodied constraints on agency that even the most advantaged patients find resource-draining and goal-displacing as the disease progresses. Reconceptualizing time as a ruptured relationship between agency and contexts offers important sociological insights into how resources, institutions, and culture operate and intertwine to shape inequality in healthcare and beyond.

PMID:
42502574
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement