AI-based anatomical recognition for bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors

Shinnosuke Fujiwara, Keishiro Fukumoto, Masashi Takeuchi, Yuichiro Konnai, Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeo Kosaka, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Masaru Ishida, Yuko Kitagawa, Mototsugu Oya

Published in

BJU international. Jul 26, 2026. Epub Jul 26, 2026.

Abstract

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for anatomical recognition that can automatically identify key anatomical structures during bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), a critical yet technically demanding step.
We constructed an AI model and evaluated its accuracy using 210 RARP videos from two institutions. A total of 1353 frames of bladder neck dissection were extracted from 25 videos, and the boundaries of the prostate, bladder and retrotrigonal layer were annotated. The DeepLabV3+ model was employed in developing the anatomical recognition AI model. An active learning approach was applied by iteratively retraining the model using frames with poor initial performance. The model was further evaluated using 202 independent test frames derived from seven surgeons. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the intersection over union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient.
The IoU of the initial AI model was 0.41 for the prostate and 0.44 for the bladder. The retrained model demonstrated improved segmentation performance, with final IoU values of 0.75 and 0.68, respectively. In an independent test dataset derived from seven surgeons, segmentation performance for the prostate and bladder was maintained.
We developed an AI system for anatomical recognition and improved its accuracy by using retraining processes. The retrained AI model demonstrated high accuracy, and its use is anticipated to support surgeons and aid in the education of novice surgeons.

PMID:
42503033
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.