Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses.

Authors

Sharan Banagiri, Eric Thrane, Paul D Lasky

Published in

Physical review letters. Volume 137. Issue 2. Pages 021403. Jul 10, 2026.

Abstract

With the release of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA gravitational-wave catalog (GWTC-4), we are starting to gain a detailed view of the population of merging binary black holes. The formation channels of these black holes is not clearly understood, but different formation mechanisms may lead to subpopulations with different properties visible in gravitational-wave data. Adopting a phenomenological approach, we find GWTC-4.0 data supports the presence of at least three subpopulations, each associated with a different range of black hole mass and with sharp transition boundaries between them. Each subpopulation is characterized by different distributions for either the mass ratios, the black-hole spin magnitudes or both. Subpopulation A with primary mass m_{1}≤27.7_{-3.4}^{+4.1}M_{⊙} (90% credibility), is characterized by a nearly flat mass ratio distribution q=m_{2}/m_{1}, and by small spin magnitudes (χ≤0.5_{-0.1}^{+0.1}). Subpopulation B, with 27.7_{-3.4}^{+4.1}M_{⊙}≤m_{1}≤40.2_{-3.2}^{+4.7}M_{⊙}, has a much sharper preference for mass ratio q≈1. Subpopulation C, with m_{1}≥40.2_{-3.2}^{+4.7}M_{⊙}, has support for large spin magnitudes, and tentative support for mass ratios q≈0.5. We interpret these transitions as evidence for multiple subpopulations, each potentially associated with a different formation pathways. We suggest putative formation scenarios for each subpopulation, and explore chemically homogeneous evolution, population III stars and dynamical formation channels as an explanation for subpopulation B. Our findings for subpopulation C are largely consistent with recent claims of hierarchical mergers but with some curious differences in properties.

PMID:
42503099
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.