Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters to Prevent Winter Respiratory Infections in Care Homes: The AFRI-c Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Created on 27 Jul 2026

Authors

Alastair D Hay, Rachel C M Brierley, Nick Turner, Joanna C Thorn, Sophie Rees, Claire E Brown, Laurel Campbell-Smith, Eleanor A Gidman, Emily J Henderson, Graziella Mazza, Gemma Morgan, Derren Ready, Craig Riddington, Jane Sprackman, Jodi Taylor, Tomas Welsh, Ruth Kipping

Published in

JAMA internal medicine. Jul 27, 2026. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

Portable high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters effectively remove airborne microbes.
To investigate whether HEPA filters reduce respiratory infection episodes in care home residents.
This 2-arm cluster randomized clinical trial included care homes for older adults in England, with or without nursing and dementia care provision, and capacity for 20 or more residents in individual bedrooms. Data were collected between September 2021 and May 2024, with each care home participating for 1 winter.
Up to 5 HEPA filters for communal areas (clean air delivery rate set at 160 m3/h) and up to 16 filters for bedrooms (clean air delivery rate set at 60 m3/h). Both groups continued usual infection prevention and control measures.
The primary outcome was respiratory infection rate per winter per bedroom resident (exposed to bedroom and communal room filters). Secondary outcomes included staff absenteeism. All outcomes were also explored for residents exposed only to communal room filters.
During the study period, 91 care homes were randomized, 47 to receive communal room filters, with 569 bedroom residents (median [IQR] age, 87 [81-92] years; 398 [70.0%] female), and 44 without communal room filters, with 589 residents without bedroom filters (median [IQR] age, 88 [82-92] years; 23 [71.8%] female). There was no evidence of a difference in the number of respiratory infections per winter per intervention vs control bedroom residents (0.99 vs 1.04; adjusted incident rate ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.33; P = .67). There was also no evidence of a difference in the rates of staff absenteeism (adjusted incident rate ratio, 0.80 95% CI, 0.55-1.16; P = .24). Results were similar for the residents exposed only to communal room HEPA filters.
In this cluster randomized clinical trial, there was no difference in resident respiratory infection rates in care homes with HEPA filters in communal areas and bedrooms. Care homes should continue existing recommended prevention measures to control respiratory and other infections.
isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN63437172.

PMID:
42507455
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement